Year: 2015

Selective Open Theism

Daniel A Fresh View of God, Free Will vs Predestination, Prophecy

There are many different views on God’s foreknowledge, predestination, prophecies, and free will.

I have recently embraced “Open Theism,” but my view is a customized version of Open Theism which harmonizes with the Scriptures even better (in my humble opinion).

I refer to my view as “Selective Theism” or “Selective Open Theism.” In general, it is the same as Open Theism, with one major difference: 

Open Theism says God cannot know certain things about the future because they haven’t happened yet, and God can’t know in advance what a person with free will would choose to do.

Selective Open Theism says God has the ability to know the future, but He chooses only to selectively know certain things, related to His purposes and prophecies, but blocks out the rest in order to allow free will to play out.

Selective Open Theism does a better job of explaining and harmonizing the fact that God, in the Bible, centuries in advance, predestined that evil men would murder His Son, Jesus, and also predestined that one of Jesus’ close friends would betray Him. (Acts 4:27-28) Otherwise, the alternative option is, that God had to cause the evil men to commit evil and murder Jesus, which would be a violation of James 1:13.

Jesus Himself exercised Selective Foreknowledge at Mark 13:32.

In the Old Testament, God seems to have exercised Selective Foreknowledge many times (Genesis 22:1, 12; Exodus 16:4; Exodus 20:20; many other passages too) where He blocks out future knowledge of free will choices, and has to watch them unfold as they happen.

However, by the same token, there are certain prophecies where God knows the minute, exact details, sometimes centuries in advance! (Daniel 9:24-26; Isaiah 45; 1 Samuel 10:2-16)

This also explains why God changes His mind at times. He discovers things that people are doing (or failing to do), and reacts accordingly. (Jonah 3:9-10; Exodus 32:14; Genesis 6:6-7)

The Bible makes it clear that God CAN change His mind unless He has sworn an oath or made a promise! (Jeremiah 18:6-10; Hebrews 6:17-18)

Now, the question may arise: How can God selectively choose what He wants to know about the future, unless He already knows ALL of the future?

This seems to be a mystery that the Bible simply doesn’t clearly explain. However, it possibly gives hints, if we examine how and when Jesus saw the future when He was on earth.

Each time Jesus saw the future, or spoke about the future of a thing or a person, He was right there with the thing or person. For example, Jesus was looking at the Temple when He foretold the future destruction of that Temple. Jesus was sitting next to Peter when He foretold that Peter would deny Him three times. Jesus was eating bread with Judas when Jesus saw that Judas was about to betray Him.

So, perhaps it is similar with God in heaven. Maybe God’s foreknowledge is triggered when He thinks about certain people or things, and then He can choose to zoom in or zoom out, regarding their future.

(The only other theory I can think of, is that God sees ALL of the future, but then He selects to forget most of it, in order to allow true free will.)

The Old Testament Law of Moses

The Bible makes it very clear that God only gave the Mosaic Law to the Jews for a limited time period, and that these laws included special rules for the culture and circumstances of that time, as well as concessions made for sinful, stubborn people, which did not represent God’s ideal commandments. (Matthew 19:8; Galatians 3:23-29)

The Law of Moses expired and became obsolete after the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. (Galatians 5:1-4; Hebrews 8:7-13; Romans 10:4)

This, as well as the fact that God tolerated less-than-ideal practices in the Mosaic Law, such as polygamy, incest, slavery, women being treated as property, shows God to be flexible and open to change in His dealings with imperfect, evolving human beings.

The Case for Free Will

Daniel A Fresh View of God, Free Will vs Predestination, Science

The Case for Free Will

From an Atheist’s Perspective

Each of us assumes free will exists whenever we make a logical argument or an appeal to reason. If free will is an illusion, then so is the freedom to logically form an argument using reason. If you aren’t actually choosing to think about the logic of an argument, but instead, you’re only following pre-programmed cause-and-effect, there would be no way of ever knowing if anything is real, and you would never even be able to trust the conclusion that free will is an illusion, since that could be an illusion as well.

Coming to the conclusion that free will is an illusion is self-defeating (since, if it were true, we would never know whether it was actually true) and it goes against all the assumptions we make during logical arguments and using the scientific method. This conclusion destroys the very foundation that was used to arrive at the conclusion.

It therefore seems more logical to come to the conclusion which supports the validity and trustworthiness of logical conclusions, which is the existence of free will.

How Can the Subconscious Brain Choose Things WITHOUT Intention?

People who deny the existence of free will usually say that the subconscious brain selects our thoughts for us, then gives the conscious part of our minds the illusion that we used reason and logic to make a rational choice.

But think about this deeply: How can a part of the brain with NO intentionality, NO goal, and NO plan or purpose, choose to prefer truth over lies, or choose “good” morals over “bad” morals? How can this non-intentional part of your mind select what is rational over what is irrational, without any goal?

This leads directly into our next subheading…

Why Trust Your Subconscious?

If your subconscious has no intentionality, no plan, no purpose, and no goal, why would you trust any of your thoughts to be the truth instead of falsehood? Why would you trust any of your morals to be “good” instead of “bad?”

If your subconscious brain is constantly feeding the conscious brain illusions and lies, why would you believe any of your thoughts given to you by your subconscious?

Do We Have TWO Separate Wills in the Brain?

If you want to claim that your subconscious brain does operate according to its own will, with its own intentionality, plans, and goals, then you aren’t actually denying free will. Instead, what you are claiming is that your brain has TWO wills, one (the subconscious) which has more control over the other, and the conscious mind doesn’t have access to the subconscious mind.

In order for the subconscious brain to have intentionality, it would have to have its own free will, therefore, you still would have free will and intentionality, but somehow this would take place separately from your conscious mind.

So your subconscious has its own plans, and is deceiving your conscious brain so that you don’t get in its way.

I think it’s much simpler (thus following Occam’s Razor) and more logical, to assume that free will actually exists at the conscious level.

From a Biblical Perspective

Despite what many Calvinists and determinists say, the Bible makes it clear that Yahweh highly values and respects the free will that He granted to humans, and He doesn’t like to intervene to alter free will, or the course of history, unless certain thresholds are passed first.

God is love, and love is not possible without freedom to choose to express it. Without free will, “love” would just be a robotic action we were pre-programmed to perform. In fact, every action we take would be determined from eternity past, and God would basically be a puppet-master pulling all the strings, or simply watching things unfold exactly how He already decided they would.

The very first human events recorded in the Scriptures are God having humans go through tests so that they could exercise their free will – Adam and Eve on whether they would eat from the Tree, Cain on whether he would kill Abel or not.

God gave the precious gift of free will to His angels also. A beautiful spirit (commonly called Lucifer), a very high-ranking angel, was granted free will. But he used this free will to turn and attack God in an attempt to be worshiped as God himself. Lucifer harmed many of the other angels and humans in his destructive quest. Lucifer is now known as Satan the Devil. (Isaiah 14:9-20; Ezekiel 28:13-18; Luke 10:18)

Without free will, God had to have programmed Lucifer to rebel, and programmed Adam and Eve to sin, thus God would be the direct cause and architect of all of the evil and suffering we see on earth. This is in direct contradiction to what the Bible says at James 1:13. 

In addition, it would mean God Himself is very illogical and irrational in getting angry with His creation for doing exactly what He programmed them to do. This would not harmonize with the logical minds He gave us. Plus, many other Scriptures declare that God never does anything immoral or evil.

Also, it goes against how we view ourselves and how we view reality and logic, so even without appealing to the Bible, it doesn’t make sense. If we assume that our moral values were given to us by God, then it would be illogical for a God who has similar morals as we do, to be the author of evil.

To quote “Truth Magazine” on this topic:

“Morality is real only if mankind is free to choose. In a world of fate or determinism, in which all things are predetermined and fixed, mankind has no responsibility.”

God Changes His Mind

Daniel A Fresh View of God , ,

The popular modern claim in many Christian churches that “God never changes His mind,” is false and does NOT agree with the Bible.

The Holy Scriptures are actually quite clear that God does indeed change His mind:

* God changed His mind and regretted that He had created mankind because of their evil. (Genesis 6:6)

* The Lord changed His mind and decided not to destroy the Israelites after Moses pleaded with God. (Exodus 32:12-14)

* God changed His mind and told the angel to stop killing people. (2 Samuel 24:16)

* God changed His mind and decided not to annihilate King Rehoboam. (2 Chronicles 12:12)

* God changed His mind and decided not to destroy the city of Nineveh after He told Jonah He would. (Jonah 3:10)

* God promised that He would change His mind in response to humans changing their minds. (Jeremiah 12:15; 18:7-10)

___________________________

The only time God is not free to change His mind, is when He has made a vow, promise, or oath. He views those as unbreakable. (Hebrews 6:17-18)

1 Samuel 15:29 and Numbers 23:19 are declaring that God does not change His mind **like a human does** (in other words, God doesn’t change His mind for no reason, or for fickle/sinful reasons– God isn’t wishy-washy).

What is “Fusion Theism?”

Daniel Fusion Theism Movement, Welcome , ,

What is Fusion Theism?

This is My Declaration of Fusion Theism

These are the primary principles of the Fusion Theism Movement I am trying to start in all the churches everywhere:
  1. Truth is more important than any tradition or creed.
  2. Truth is on an equal level with kindness, and the two should be balanced together in harmony.
  3. Logic should always be used when reasoning or studying in the Scriptures or anything else. If it is illogical, reject it.
  4. The Holy Scriptures are inspired of God, but not necessarily inerrant, and not all Scripture is of equal importance for us today.
  5. The teachings and words of Jesus Himself take priority over and above any other teachings found in the Bible. (Hebrews 2:1-5)
  6. We must all imitate the example of the Noble-Minded Beroeans, and carefully compare everything we hear from our pastors, preachers, elders, deacons, bishops, overseers, fathers, cardinals, and the Pope, to the inspired Scriptures to make sure it agrees with God’s message. (Acts 17:11)
  7. Modern Bible Translations are good and can be considered “inspired” of God, but they are not infallible or inerrant.
  8. God is never the author of evil thoughts. (James 1:13) Therefore, any belief system that says God ordained evil thoughts should be rejected.
  9. Christians should not divide or stop fellowship over non-essential doctrines. (Romans 14)
  10. I recommend that we should not be looking for hidden, secret meanings in the Bible unless the Scriptures tell us to do so (such as in Revelation), since this would make us more likely to go beyond what is written, and add or take away from God’s clear messages.
  11. God can and does change His mind, and views Himself as free to do so unless He has sworn an oath or made a promise.
  12. God has the ability to see anything He desires to know about the future, but God selectively chooses to use this ability to only know certain things related to His purposes.
  13. The Bible does not teach a literal eternal torment in Hellfire.
  14. Jesus had sinful desires just like we do, yet He never gave into them to commit sin.
  15. All essential beliefs should be based on the inspired holy books and not on the later creeds or councils.
  16. Science, including evolution, should be accepted. God made the universe and told us to observe it. No one observes it better than scientists. Our beliefs should harmonize with modern scientific facts.
  17. The Law of Moses expired when Jesus came to earth as the Messiah, died, was resurrected, and ascended.
  18. Jesus came down from above, sent by God the Father, as a real human, fulfilled the Law, suffered and died for our sins, was buried, rose from the dead, ascended into heaven, and is returning one day.
  19. Jesus is Lord, Mighty God, Savior, Messiah, King, Mediator, High Priest, the Divine Son of God, and the Son of Man sitting at God’s right hand.

Introducing the FEV Bible Version

Daniel FEV Bible , , ,

I am making my own revision/update of the Holy Bible. The New Testament is almost complete. It is called the “Fusion English Version” (FEV). I have posted the Gospel of John on Amazon as a Kindle Book, and it is only 99 cents for a limited time! Check it out here, and your purchase of it will help support this blog, and I would truly appreciate any feedback, comments, suggestions, and critiques.

Notes About This Particular Edition

This Kindle edition of the FEV is the Gospel (Good News) by John the Apostle. Other books of the Bible in the FEV Version will be available in Kindle format soon. Keep checking Amazon.com. Hopefully the entire New Testament will be available by early 2016.

The Goal

The goal of this English Bible, named the “Fusion English  Version” (FEV) or “Fusion Bible” for short, is not to start from scratch on a brand new English Bible translation, but rather, to examine the greatest English Bible versions of the past, and improve them, by creating a “fusion” of the best parts of each great Bible version, along with the best and latest information from Bible scholars, lexicons, dictionaries, commentaries, and scholar notes.

The Starting Point

The basic starting text of the Fusion English Version (FEV) is the public domain “World English Bible” (WEB) version. This Bible version was chosen as my starting point because:

  1.  The WEB Bible is in the public domain, and the author of it gives permission to update/change it as long as the update is re-named and no longer called the “WEB Bible.”
  2. The WEB Bible is an excellent translation, itself being an update and improvement on the masterful 1901 American Standard Version (ASV).

There is no reason to spend years and years to reinvent the wheel, and retread over the same translation from scratch (directly from the Hebrew and Greek manuscripts) which has already been done by much better experts than myself.

The Greek Texts

I have updated the WEB Bible to reflect the opinion of the majority of Greek experts, and the Manuscripts which they trust most.

With that said, my aim is to make this Bible acceptable and beneficial for ALL Christians to use, and so that is why I am including the disputed passages from the Textus Receptus and/or Majority Text. However, due to the majority of Greek scholars and experts saying that the Textus Receptus/Majority Text is not the most accurate of the Manuscripts, I am placing the words from those Manuscripts in double-brackets with the words inside highlighted in orange text, [[ KJV adds: just like this ]].

Significant Updates

You will notice the following important changes, which bring out the meaning of the words in English much more clearly than the traditional renderings:

  • “Christ” and “Messiah” in this edition are “Chosen King” or “Chosen One.”
  • “Heaven” is “the Exalted Realm.”
  • “Angel” is “exalted messenger” or “messenger.”
  • “Baptism” is “immersion.”
  • “Worship” is “give homage.”
  • “Son of Man” is “The New Adam.”
  • “Holy” is “Sacred.”
  • “Spirit” is “invisible force,” “invisible Divine Force,” or “invisible inner force.”
  • “Soul” is “spark of life.”
  • “Sin” is “evil” or “commit evil.”

Colored Text

The words of Jesus are in red letters in this Bible. The words of God are in blue letters.

As noted above, any passages from the traditional Textus Receptus or Majority Text, which are not found in the oldest Greek manuscripts, will be highlighted in orange letters, instead of the normal black text.

Quotations of the Old Testament by writers in the New Testament are in purple letters.

Here’s a helpful little list:

  • Red Letters: The words of Jesus
  • Blue Letters: The words of God
  • Orange Letters: Textus Receptus and Majority Text passages
  • Purple Letters: Quotations of the Old Testament

Quotations of the Old Testament found in the New Testament, are also highlighted by bold and italics, followed by the Scripture number for handy reference.

Pronoun Capitalization

Pronouns referring to God and Jesus are not capitalized in this Bible because, even though I personally like that feature in other Bibles (such as the NASB, NKJV):

  1. I feel that there is less chance of my error in leaving them all uncapitalized. I would hate to mislead anyone by accidentally misinterpreting who is being referred to in a certain unclear passage. I would rather leave that interpretation up to each reader.
  2. Pronouns referring to Deity were not capitalized in the base text I started with (World English Bible).
  3. Pronouns referring to Deity had no unique or special markings in the original Hebrew or Greek texts of the Bible.
  4. I personally think it looks more stylish and easier on the eyes when pronouns are not capitalized.

With that said, there are certain locations in the Bible where the context makes it clear who is speaking, or being spoken to, or about, and in those cases I have replaced the words “he,” “him,” “she,” “her,” etc. with the name of the individual being referred to.

The Divine Name of God

The Divine Name, YHWH, is obviously important to God and the Bible writers, since it was used about 7,000 times in the Old Testament. Therefore, in this FEV Bible, it is rendered as “Lord Jehovah Yahweh” in order to bring out the full impact, significance, and traditional forms of the Name.

Most modern Bible translations follow an ancient Jewish tradition of replacing the Divine Name with “LORD” or “The Eternal” instead. While I appreciate that this is done out of respect, reverence, and fear of misusing the Sacred Name, I believe it to be misguided.

If God didn’t want His Name to be written or spoken, He wouldn’t have inspired the Bible writers to include it almost 7,000 times in the Old Testament.

Scholars disagree on the precise pronunciation and spelling, but “Yahweh” is the most commonly accepted form among experts, and “Jehovah” is the traditional English translation, therefore, I have rendered “YHWH” as “Lord Jehovah Yahweh” in this version.

Full disclaimer:

The FEV is an update of the WEB Bible, however, it is not being done by the same people. The translators of the WEB Bible have no connection to this version, other than the fact that they made an outstanding Bible translation and thankfully decided to place it in the Public Domain.

This FEV Bible is a project done by one person (myself). I am not an expert on the Hebrew or Greek languages. I rely on the lexicons, dictionaries, commentaries, and Bible study notes from a wide-range of scholars and experts, to inform my decisions on making and updating the FEV Bible.

A Preacher’s Bible

Have you ever given a sermon at church, or spoken to someone in-person, teaching from the Bible, and you find yourself “correcting” the text by examining dictionaries, lexicons, commentaries, etc., and then saying “The Greek actually says such-and-such?” Well, that’s what I’ve already done for you with the FEV. That’s why this Bible can accurately be referred to as a “Preacher’s Bible” — it is already pre-corrected with the very best and most accurate information from many of the Bible scholars and experts.

One example: When you read John 3:16 to your flock, you no longer have to explain that many scholars now believe the Greek word “monogenes” doesn’t mean “only-begotten,” but instead “unique,” because the latter phrase is right there in the main Bible text. The FEV’s choice of “unique” is also more accurate and easy-to-understand than referring to Jesus as God’s “only” Son, since the Scriptures make it clear that God has other sons besides Christ.

A Layperson’s Bible

One feature of this version of the Bible is that, instead of including many difficult or archaic words and then providing a dictionary or footnotes to help the reader, the easier-to-understand “lay” definitions are rendered right in the main Scripture text. There’s no point in making Bible reading more difficult than it has to be.

This way the average church-goer (layperson) can understand much more of the Holy Word without having to do tons of research in dictionaries, or have their pastor explain it to them. (There will obviously still be some difficult spots in the Bible where deeper research is required. But this shouldn’t be necessary in every verse)

Translation Philosophy

First, I want to quote the translation philosophy of the WEB Bible (the original text that this Fusion Version was based off of):

“Bible translation (as with any natural language translation) is a balancing act, where the translators seek to preserve the following:

* The meaning of each thought or sentence.
* The meanings of individual words in their context.
* The shades of meaning implied by word forms, tense, etc.
* The impact and tone of each passage.
* The style of the original authors who were inspired by the Holy Spirit.
* Faithfulness to the target language (English, in this case).

Note that some of the above goals are at odds with one another, like preservation of the original style vs. faithfulness to the target language, and expressing the last bit of the shades of meaning vs. preserving the impact. Still, it is possible to retain a good balance.

Different balance points are chosen by different translation committees. Indeed, many translations can be characterized by the weight the translators gave to each of the above items.

For example, The Amplified Bible excels at getting the meaning across, but falls down hard on impact, style preservation, and faithfulness to the target language. The New Living Translation excels at preserving the meanings of entire thoughts, impact, and faithfulness to the target language, but loses some of the style and shades of meaning. The New International Version excels at most of the above, but loses some elements of style and some of the subtleties of wording. The World English Bible attempts to balance all of the above with a fairly literal translation.

Some people like to use the terms “formal equivalent” and “dynamic equivalent.” Neither of these exactly describe what we are doing, since we have borrowed ideas from both, but I suppose that we are closer to formal equivalence than dynamic equivalence.”

The FEV is my update to the WEB. I have clarified and explained words, and in some cases, I’ve improved the wording of whole sentences and paragraphs. I have also brought many Bible verses into harmony with the latest understandings of Bible scholars and experts.

May God be glorified by this version of His Holy Word, and may the Lord bless you as you read and study His Scriptures.

It is Time for ALL Christians to Accept Evolution

Daniel Evolution, Science , , , , , ,

It is time for Christians to accept evolution, in my opinion.

There are many reasons why I think it is long overdue for all Christians to finally accept what science says about evolution. Below I will show these reasons.

  1. The Bible tells people to pay attention to nature to see the glory of God (Psalm 19; Romans 1:19-20). No one pays closer attention to nature than scientists. Scientists know far more about nature than the average Christian does. Christians shouldn’t bury their heads in the sand. Therefore, the humble, honest Christian should defer to the experts on nature.
  2. There is no contradiction between what science shows regarding evolution, and what Genesis reveals about God’s creation of the universe. For example, see my other blog post, “You can believe in a Literal Genesis and Evolution.” Also you can google to research other interpretations of Genesis. You should especially visit BioLogos. (For additional reading, please see Allegorical Interpretations of Genesis)
  3. Christians are commanded by the New Testament to be in subjection to the government leaders and officials (Romans 13:1-4), and since they are promoting evolution as scientific fact, we should accept this without fighting, as long as no essential doctrine is at stake.
  4. There is no contradiction between accepting evolution and believing in the Gospel of Jesus Christ. There is no reason you can’t believe in both Jesus saving us from sin and that evolution was the natural process God used to create life on earth.
  5. Publicly opposing or condemning evolution or the scientists who teach it, makes Christianity look very bad and ignorant in the eyes of the world. If we want the world to take us seriously about anything we teach about God or Jesus, then we need to stop making ourselves look like fools when it comes to science.
  6. We don’t want our children or grandchildren falling behind in having the latest scientific knowledge or breakthroughs due to denying the fundamental theories of science, such as evolution.

Yes, You Can Believe in a Literal Genesis AND Evolution

Daniel Evolution, Science, Scientific Harmony Series , , , , ,

Scientific Harmony Series — The Bible and Science Can Agree

Here is my “Fusion” view on Adam & Eve and Evolution:

  1. God began the process of evolution and natural selection 3.5 billion years ago on earth.
  2. Anatomically-modern humans first evolved about 200,000 years ago in Africa.
  3. Around 15,000 years ago (due to the gaps in Bible genealogies), in Iraq, God decides to make a special Garden Paradise, and He chooses to instantaneously create new animals and new human beings to populate this Garden, as part of Grand Test, which came about after a heavenly war between God and one of His top angels, commonly called Lucifer, who became Satan (“the Serpent”).
  4. Inside the Garden of Eden, everything is a perfect, peaceful utopia, with no animal death, no violence, all animals are herbivores.
  5. God creates Adam instantaneously out of dust and later creates Eve from a transplanted rib from Adam.
  6. Meanwhile, outside of the Garden, evolution and natural selection of animals and humans, along with death, disease, decay, violence, the food chain, continues as it always has.
  7. Naturally-evolved humans were already living for thousands of years before Adam, and that is why Adam’s son, Cain, is afraid that these people will kill him, and that is how Cain found a woman to be his wife, even though Adam had no daughters yet. It also explains how Cain and his wife were able to move to a city that had already been built.
  8. It is possible that Genesis 6 is describing Adam’s descendants (through Seth) having sex with, and marrying, the naturally-evolved women, and this causing much evil in God’s eyes, with people abandoning God.
  9. In any case, if Noah’s Flood was worldwide, then that means God killed off all naturally-evolved humans, and only Adam’s line remains today. If Noah’s Flood was NOT worldwide, then people today derive from both Adam’s line and the naturally-evolved humans.
  10. See, there is no reason to abandon science or a literal Adam, in order to be a Christian.

My Fog-Theory of Genesis Chapter 1

Genesis 1:1: In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

No date is given for the creation of the sky/universe or the earth. The Bible simply and beautifully says, “In the beginning…” I accept what science says: The universe is 13+ billion years old, and the earth is 4.54 billion years old. This does not in any way conflict with the Bible.

This is one of the main things science still cannot answer, and perhaps, never will be able to answer — where did our universe come from?

Genesis 1:2:  Now the earth was without shape and empty, and darkness was over the surface of the watery deep, but the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the water.

The “darkness” here is a very dense, thick fog, which is blocking the sun and moon and stars from being seen clearly in the sky, and made it so dark that shapes of things could not be seen. (The Hebrew word rendered here as “darkness” was often used for fog, and it fits the context) Some modern Bible versions agree with this view. They include the Living Bible and the Voice.

Genesis 1:3:  God said, “Let there be light.” And there was light!

Now God begins to thin out the fog, so that more light can reach the surface. He’s not creating or inventing light here. No, rather, He is causing more light to be visible from the standpoint of someone on earth.

Genesis 1:4:  God saw that the light was good, so God separated the light from the darkness.

God thinned the fog enough that the difference between day and night could be observed.

Genesis 1:5:  God called the light “day” and the darkness “night.” There was evening, and there was morning, marking the first day.

The word “day” can mean “time period” (Keep in mind that Genesis 2:4 uses “day” to refer to “time period” or “era”). In other places in the Bible, it says God views 1,000 human years as one “day” to Him. In Hebrews chapter 4, it claims that “Day 7” of this creation account was STILL ongoing thousands of years later, which would mean each “Day” could be thousands or millions of years long.

 I accept what science says: The earth is 4.54 billion years old, and life on earth is 3.5 billion years old.

Genesis 1:6-8:  God said, “Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters and let it separate water from water. So God made the expanse and separated the water under the expanse from the water above it. It was so. God called the expanse “sky.” There was evening, and there was morning, a second day.

This “expanse” was named “Sky,” so there is really no strong, persuasive reason to believe that the Bible writer thought this “sky” was a hard, solid dome, as some skeptics, critics, and atheists assume. Even if the writer of Genesis did have the ancient idea of a solid dome sky, this doesn’t really cause any theological issues or problems. It would simply mean that the writer held on to to some of the mistaken ancient views of the world and didn’t have access to modern science.

 The “waters above” may simply refer to clouds, but it is possible it is referring to a “Cloud Canopy” that existed back then, which God later bursts open to flood the earth with.

Genesis 1:9-10:  God said, “Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place and let dry ground appear.” It was so. God called the dry ground “land” and the gathered waters he called “seas.” God saw that it was good.

Finally, God causes the dry ground to appear. Prior to this, the earth was covered entirely with water.

Genesis 1:11-13:  God said, “Let the land produce vegetation: plants yielding seeds according to their kinds, and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds.” It was so. The land produced vegetation — plants yielding seeds according to their kinds, and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. God saw that it was good. There was evening, and there was morning, a third day.

Genesis 1:14-19:  God said, “Let there be lights in the expanse of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them be signs to indicate seasons and days and years, and let them serve as lights in the expanse of the sky to give light on the earth.” It was so. God made two great lights — the greater light to rule over the day and the lesser light to rule over the night. He made the stars also. God placed the lights in the expanse of the sky to shine on the earth, to preside over the day and the night, and to separate the light from the darkness. God saw that it was good. There was evening, and there was morning, a fourth day.

God is NOT creating the sun, moon, and stars here. He ALREADY created them back in Genesis 1:1, where it says God created the heavens and the earth. “Heavens and earth” was a Hebrew phrase for “the universe.” It is here saying that God is placing them in the sky where they can be visible from the earth. What God is doing is thinning out the dense fog even more, to where the sun, moon, and stars are now clearly visible in the sky from the earth.

Genesis 1:20-23:  God said, “Let the water swarm with swarms of living creatures and let birds fly above the earth across the expanse of the sky.” God created the great sea creatures and every living and moving thing with which the water swarmed, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. God saw that it was good. God blessed them and said, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds multiply on the earth.” There was evening, and there was morning, a fifth day.

Genesis agrees with science that sea creatures lived first, prior to any other life on earth.

Genesis 1:24-25:  God said, “Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: cattle, creeping things, and wild animals, each according to its kind.” It was so. God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the cattle according to their kinds, and all the creatures that creep along the ground according to their kinds. God saw that it was good.

Skeptics have long claimed there is a discrepancy with science here, with birds being created BEFORE reptiles, however I have discovered now that the Hebrew word (tan-neen’) used in Genesis 1:21, BEFORE birds are mentioned, can indeed mean “snake/reptile.” Thus yet another skeptic/atheist argument is shown to be false.


(As a side-note, I do NOT believe in Biblical inerrancy, where every word must be perfect, or else the entire Bible is false. I don’t subscribe to that belief. This frees me up to have a wider range of possible interpretations without destroying my faith) 
 
Many Christians completely interpret Genesis 1 through 4 or 1 through 6 as an allegory or parable, not intended to teach literal historical events. I can understand the reasoning behind doing so, and it is possible that is the correct way of interpreting Genesis. But I find my “Fusion” interpretation more appealing and accurate in line with how the rest of the Bible quotes Genesis.

If you ever do find a true discrepancy between Genesis and current scientific thought, it is possible that Genesis OR science is simply incorrect on a particular point. I’ll let you decide on that. (Keep in mind that science is absolutely NOT infallible, especially on historical sciences. Scientists are revising and correcting themselves every single day.)

 Genesis 1:26-27:  Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, after our likeness, so they may rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move on the earth.” God created humankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them, male and female he created them.Right from the very beginning of the Bible, God proclaims the equality of men and women — they are both equally created in God’s image, reflecting God’s qualities, emotions, logic, and morality.

Genesis 1:28-31:  God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply! Fill the earth and subdue it! Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and every creature that moves on the ground.” Then God said, “I now give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the entire earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. And to all the animals of the earth, and to every bird of the air, and to all the creatures that move on the ground — everything that has the breath of life in it — I give every green plant for food.” It was so. God saw all that he had made — and it was very good! There was evening, and there was morning, the sixth day.

I believe that this is referring to a special instantaneous creation that God performed when He was ready to plant His special Perfect Garden (see Genesis Chapter 2). God let the earth, animals, and humans evolve naturally up to a certain point. Then He stepped in and performed a special instantaneous creation of animals to fill this Garden, and of two perfect human beings to live there in the Garden. Meanwhile, outside the Garden, everything (including evolved humans) continued naturally the way it always had.

 The people and animals which God instantaneously created for His Garden, were to live as vegetarians, and there was no death of animals or humans at all inside this Garden (until Adam’s sin). But outside the Garden natural death was taking place like it always had.

(I am only throwing this out there as an open-minded possibility to ponder: The Hebrew word for “heavens” can mean the “sky” or atmosphere, instead of outer space or God’s spiritual realm. If this is the case here, it is *possible* that “Elohim” could be a race of extraterrestrial beings (“aliens”) who terraformed earth, seeded life, and initiated evolution, then visited us again thousands of years later.)

(All Scripture references are from the NET Bible)
_____________________________________________________
{Photo Credit: “Adam na restauratie” by Michelangelo Buonarroti – Transferred from nl.wikipedia. Licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons – http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Adam_na_restauratie.jpg#/media/File:Adam_na_restauratie.jpg}

Jesus’ Olivet Prophecy was Fulfilled in 70 A.D. — Simplified Scriptures Series

Daniel Prophecy, Simplified Scriptures Series , ,

Simplified Scriptures Series (SSS / Triple-S)

In this series, I am going to present my views on various Scriptures and doctrines, in an attempt to present the simplest, best interpretations which don’t require looking for any secondary, secret meanings. Don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying that these Scriptures (or other parts of the Bible) never have secondary meanings or fulfillments, I’m just saying that my view is that it is safer, and more of a sure bet, to focus on the primary, surface-level meaning rather than going too far beyond what is written. My view is that in Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21, Christ’s words only applied to the destruction of the Jewish Temple by the Roman armies in 70 A.D. and do not have a hidden antitypical second fulfillment today. This would be in perfect agreement with Luke 21:5-7 (NET), which reads:

Now  while some were speaking about the temple, how it was adorned  with beautiful stones and offerings, Jesus said, “As for these things that you are gazing at, the days will come when not one stone will be left on another. All will be torn down!”  So they asked him, “Teacher, when will these things happen? And what will be the sign that these things are about to take place?”

This context clearly shows that Luke 21 (the parallel account of Matthew 24 and Mark 13) is Jesus and the disciples focusing only on the destruction of the Jewish Temple which they were looking at, not an antitypical future second fulfillment 2,000 years later. Continue down and look at Luke 21:20-28, Jesus explicitly says that these things will occur when the armies surround the city of Jerusalem, which was fulfilled in 66-70 A.D., concluding when the Roman General Titus destroyed the Temple.

Luke 21:20 (NET): “But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation has come near.”

Earlier Christ had prophesied this same judgment and condemnation as a punishment on the Jews in Jerusalem for rejecting the Messiah during the time of the inspection/visitation. This is found in Luke 19:41-44 (NET):

Now when Jesus approached and saw the city, he wept over it, saying, “If you had only known on this day, even you, the things that make for peace! But now they are hidden from your eyes. For the days will come upon you when your enemies will build an embankment against you and surround you and close in on you from every side. They will demolish you  – you and your children within your walls – and they will not leave within you one stone on top of another, because you did not recognize the time of your visitation from God.”

Jesus continued to warn about this same event, the destruction of the Jewish Temple, in Luke 23:27-31. Jesus once again warned Jerusalem about its destruction. All of this, in my opinion, has nothing to do with some secondary antitypical fulfillment 2,000 years later.

This explains why Jesus said “this generation will not pass away until all these things occur,” (Matthew 24:34) “all of this will come upon this generation,” (Matthew 23:36) and “you will not finish preaching in the cities of Israel before I come.” (Matthew 10:23)

One more point to consider: Christ repeatedly said that when this “great tribulation” takes place, His disciples would be brought before the synagogues to be judged and condemned. Synagogues don’t have this legal authority today, but they sure did in the 1st Century A.D. (Matthew 10:17; Mark 13:9; Luke 12:11; John 16:2; Matthew 23:34)

Jesus used hyperbole and symbolism to describe this event of the Romans destroying the Temple in 70 A.D., by saying they would see Jesus in the clouds and at the right hand of God. This symbolizes Christ’s power and authority as King.

Matthew 26:64 (NET): Jesus said to him, “You have said it yourself. But I tell you, from now on you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power and coming on the clouds of heaven.”

This is symbolism taken from Daniel chapter 7, where it was foretold that the Messiah (Son of Man, New Adam) would ascend from earth to heaven in order to sit at God’s right hand and receive all power and authority, including the authority to execute justice and vengeance on His enemies. The other symbolic and hyperbolic language used by Jesus was taken from Joel, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and other books of the Old Testament. The phrases about “signs in the heavens” and “the sun and moon not giving their light” and “stars falling,” were all used by various prophets in their messages representing the destruction that God was bringing upon a city or nation. Now, it is possible that these things had a literal fulfillment too, but it may have just been hyperbole and apocalyptic symbolism.

___________________________________________________

{Photo Recognition: “Ercole de Roberti Destruction of Jerusalem Fighting Fleeing Marching Slaying Burning Chemical reactions b” by David Roberts – net. Licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons – http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ercole_de_Roberti_Destruction_of_Jerusalem_Fighting_Fleeing_Marching_Slaying_Burning_Chemical_reactions_b.jpg#/media/File:Ercole_de_Roberti_Destruction_of_Jerusalem_Fighting_Fleeing_Marching_Slaying_Burning_Chemical_reactions_b.jpg}

A Little Bit About Me

Daniel Welcome ,

Hello all!

My name is Daniel. I am politically moderate (Democrat, but I don’t always agree with the Democratic Party). I am a strong believer in Jesus as my Lord and Savior, and that the Holy Bible is inspired of God and contains the message He wants us to have. I do not subscribe to the doctrine of inerrancy. This just means that I don’t believe the Bible needs to be absolutely, 100% free of every tiny, little error in order to still contain the Word of God. The Scriptures can contain copyist mistakes, historical inaccuracies, scientific misunderstandings, etc. and still be used by God to bring His message about His Son to mankind.

I am Pro-Choice, I support the freedom for gay marriage, I promote equality for women and all people, I totally accept what science says about evolution and the age of the earth & universe.

I am a “Preterist” regarding Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21. That just means I view those chapters as being fulfilled in 70 A.D., not having a 2nd, hidden meaning that applies 2,000 years later.

I am a “Selective Open Theist.” This just means that God, in my view, selects not to see every detail of the future in order to allow free will, because God values and cherishes the freedom to choose so much. It is also possible that some things about the future simply cannot be known in advance due to free will.

I don’t think the traditional doctrines of the Trinity, Hell, or Predestination are correct, but I also don’t condemn or look down upon those who do. We are all brothers and sisters in Christ.

Even though I fully accept evolution, I also fully accept a literal Adam, literal Eve, and literal Garden of Eden. Future blog posts will explain and give more details on this seemingly contradictory position. I don’t look down on anyone because of their beliefs regarding Genesis, however, I do recommend accepting what modern science says about evolution.

Welcome to the All-NEW Fusion Theism blog!

Daniel Fusion Theism Movement, Welcome ,

The goal of this blog, just like my previous one (on Blogger), is to bring all Christians (plus all Bible believers and theists) together from all denominations, groups, churches, and traditions, for the purpose of reasoning on the Scriptures and arriving at a “FUSION” of our beliefs.

My desire is for all of us (in love and mutual respect) to discuss and debate on the doctrines that divide us– including Calvinism, Arminianism, Open Theism, Molinism, Eternal Security, Faith and Works, Modern Israel, Evolution, Science, Young Earth & Old Earth, Abortion, Gay Marriage, Sex, the Trinity, Faith-Healing, “Name-It-And-Claim-It,” Baptism, Types and Antitypes, Preterism, and other topics.

My highest hope and prayer is, that through this humble blog, Christians from all over the world may come to discover together and agree on the truth of God’s Holy Word, and worship in harmony — What I call “Fusion Theism,” “Fusion Theology,” or “Fusionism.”

Ground Rules for Debate

For the “Fusion” debates we are going to have on this blog, I am going to lay out some basic ground rules for discussion, in order to facilitate civility, respect, and kindness:
  1. Absolutely no name-calling or ad hominem attacks (attacking or discrediting the person making the argument instead of the argument itself).
  2. We should point out any logical inconsistencies we see and any logical fallacies we see.
  3. No hasty generalizations. (discrediting or attacking an entire group based on the actions/beliefs of a few or the stereotypes we have in our minds)
  4. No chronological snobbery. (Discounting or discrediting a belief or idea simply because it has been around for a long time or because it is a newer idea)
  5. We will begin each discussion by laying out and discussing the beliefs which we AGREE ON, and then we will reason on the points that we disagree on currently.
  6. All of my posts and discussions will be done with the ultimate goal of glorifying Jesus Christ and sharing His love with the world.

This blog began in 2012 on Blogger, but I felt that it was time for a change, so I moved it over here to WordPress with a new design and look. I hope you enjoy.

You can find me on Twitter under the user name @AnnotatedBible.